Why the study?
Stent-based interventions alter femoropopliteal biomechanics, but no clinical functional imaging tool is established for quantitative in vivo measurements.
Is contrast-free 4D-flow MRI feasible for assessing local pulse wave velocity in PAD patients with focally stented femoropopliteal arteries compared to healthy controls?
Is contrast-free 4D-flow MRI feasible for assessing local pulse wave velocity in PAD patients with focally stented femoropopliteal arteries compared to healthy controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contrast-free 4D-flow MRI is a feasible non-invasive tool for quantifying local pulse wave velocity as a surrogate of vascular stiffness in the stented femoral arteries of patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Summary: Background: In peripheral arterial disease (PAD) the femoropopliteal (FP) artery is the most frequently recanalized lower limb artery. Stent-based interventions change the biomechanical properties of FP arteries. However, no clinical tool for functional imaging is established for quantitative measurements in vivo. Four-dimensional-flow magnetic resonance imaging enables a detailed evaluation of the hemodynamics of the central and – more challenging – the peripheral arteries. The present study aimed to determine the feasibility of assessing pulse wave velocities (PWV) as a marker of vessel stiffness in PAD patients with multiple spot stents and to compare the values with age-matched subjects and young-adult healthy subjects. Patients and methods: Contrast-free 4D-flow MRI was performed in seven PAD patients with focally stented FP arteries, five age-matched subjects after exclusion of PAD, and five young, healthy adults. PWV values were calculated from flow curves by using the foot-to-foot method. Results: Four-D-flow MRI sequences offering high spatial and temporal resolution enables quantification of flow velocity measurements and estimation of PWVs. Assessment of segmental PWV as a surrogate of vascular stiffness in focally stented femoral arteries is feasible. PWV values across all groups were 15.6±5.2 m/s, 13.3±4.1 m/s, and 9.9±2.2 m/s in PAD patients, senior-aged volunteers, and young-adult volunteers respectively. PWV values in PAD patients were similar with those in the senior-aged volunteers group (15.6±5.2 vs. 13.3 ±4.1 years, p=0.43). However, when compared to the young-adult volunteers, PAD patients had a statistically significantly higher mean local PWV (15.6±5.2 m/s vs. 9.9±2.2 m/s, p<0.05). Conclusions: Calculating segmental PWV in the femoral arteries is feasible in PAD patients with focally stented FP arteries. PWV values in PAD patients were similar to those in senior-aged volunteers, both of which were higher than in young-adult volunteers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hermann et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: