Why the study?
Does previous vaccination with oral poliovirus vaccine reduce excretion of vaccine poliovirus after challenge in children in India?
Does previous vaccination with oral poliovirus vaccine reduce excretion of vaccine poliovirus after challenge in children in India?
Mucosal immunity induced by OPV in India varies significantly by location, serotype, and vaccine formulation, with lower effectiveness in certain northern states.
Supports OPV-induced mucosal immunity reducing excretion in Indian children; leaves open serotype-specific and regional durability questions.
BACKGROUND: Persistent wild-poliovirus transmission, particularly in India, has raised questions about the degree of mucosal immunity induced by oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in tropical countries. METHODS: Excretion of vaccine poliovirus after challenge with OPV was measured in stool samples collected from children identified by the acute flaccid paralysis surveillance program in India during 2005-2007. The effectiveness of trivalent and monovalent OPV against excretion of each poliovirus type was estimated. RESULTS: Vaccine poliovirus was isolated from 4994 (5.2%) of 96,641 children with 2 stool samples. The relative odds of excreting challenge poliovirus among children with 5 reported previous doses of trivalent OPV compared with 0 previous doses was 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.45), 0.08 (95% CI, 0.04-0.14), and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.19-0.85) for serotypes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, but the relative odds increased to 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.88), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.20-0.99), and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.41-1.06), respectively, in the northern states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. In these 2 states, the relative odds of excretion of serotype 1 was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.26-0.41) after 5 doses of type 1 monovalent OPV. CONCLUSIONS: The mucosal immunity induced by OPV in India varies by location, serotype, and vaccine formulation. These findings have implications for global eradication and the potential role played by inactivated vaccine in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grassly et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: