Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate first-year compliance and clinical outcomes following implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program in elective colorectal surgery.
Does the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program improve clinical outcomes (length of stay, complications, mortality) in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?
Does the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program improve clinical outcomes (length of stay, complications, mortality) in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?
The ERAS program can be successfully implemented in elective colorectal surgery to shorten length of stay and reduce medical complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ERAS in elective colorectal surgery but should not yet change practice; leaves open RCT confirmation of these associations.
INTRODUCTION: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® program comprises the implementation of various perioperative measures that reduce surgical stress and ultimately improve patient recovery and outcome. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the first-year compliance and clinical outcomes after implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® program in elective colorectal surgery in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analysis was performed on the 210 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery from May 2016 to December 2017. The group of patients that underwent surgery after the protocol implementation (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® group) was compared to a conventional care control group (pre- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® group). Differences between the two groups were adjusted using Propensity Score matching. The main outcomes were length of stay, return of bowel function, complications and mortality. The evolution of compliance with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® principles was also analyzed. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 112 patients were included in the present study: 56 patients formed the pre-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® group and 56 the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® group. The overall adherence to the protocol increased from 35.7% to 80.8%. There was a decrease in length of stay, time to return of bowel function and medical complications. DISCUSSION: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® program is safe and seems to shorten length of stay and improve patient recovery and clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® program was possible in Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, with a positive impact in the immediate postoperative recovery of colorectal patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrão et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: