Key result
Ischaemic heart disease independently increased the risk of all-cause mortality in women with HFrEF (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.058-1.929; P=0.020), whereas no survival difference was observed in men.
Why the study?
There was uncertainty regarding the role of ischaemic heart disease in determining the risk of clinical outcomes by gender in patients with heart failure.
Does ischaemic heart disease increase the risk of all-cause death differently by gender in patients with HFrEF?
Cohort (n=1,638)
Yes
Does ischaemic heart disease increase the risk of all-cause death differently by gender in patients with HFrEF?
Odds Ratio: 1.43 (95% CI 1.058–1.929)
p-value: p=.020
Ischaemic heart disease is an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in women with HFrEF, highlighting a significant gender difference in its prognostic impact.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open a potential sex difference in IHD prognosis among HFrEF patients needing prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Although the impact of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) on heart failure (HF) is evolving, there is uncertainty about the role of IHD in determining the risk of clinical outcomes by gender. This study evaluated the gender difference in the impact of IHD on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: Study data were obtained from a nationwide registry, which is a prospective multicentre cohort that included 3200 patients who were hospitalized for HF. A total of 1638 patients with HFrEF were classified by gender. The primary outcome was all-cause death during follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 133 women (18.9%) died and 168 men (18.0%) died during the follow-up (median, 489 days). Women with HFrEF with IHD had a significantly lower cumulative survival rate than women without IHD at the long-term follow-up (74.8% vs 84.9%, log-rank P = .001). However, the survival rate was not different in men with HFrEF with IHD compared with men without IHD. A Cox regression analysis showed that IHD had a 1.43-fold increased risk for all-cause mortality independently in women after adjusting for confounding factors (odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.058-1.929, P = .020). CONCLUSION: Ischaemic heart disease was an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in women with HFrEF. IHD should be actively evaluated in women with HF for predicting clinical outcomes and initiating appropriate treatment. Women with HF caused by IHD should be treated more meticulously to avoid a poor prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=1,638). Ischaemic heart disease vs. No ischaemic heart disease was evaluated on All-cause death during follow-up (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.058-1.929, p=.020). Ischaemic heart disease independently increased the risk of all-cause mortality in women with HFrEF (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.058-1.929; P=0.020), whereas no survival difference was observed in men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: