Why the study?
Does aggressive medical therapy for hypertension prevent renal failure?
Does aggressive medical therapy for hypertension prevent renal failure?
Aggressive treatment of hypertension is advocated to prevent renal failure, despite potential initial worsening of renal function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aggressive hypertension therapy may avert renal failure despite initial GFR decline; leaves open confirmation from prospective trials given Level 5 evidence.
The association between malignant hypertension and renal insufficiency is now well established. The previous adage of not treating this entity for fear of precipitating renal failure has now been replaced by one of aggressive medical therapy as a means to prevent further renal damage. Even when treatment appears to cause renal insufficiency, continued aggressive therapy is indicated as the majority of these people will either stabilize or even improve their renal function. The association of renal failure and benign hypertension is less clear. We feel that if long-term controlled studies could be performed, benefit would be evident. However, even without this evidence, the ability to prevent the malignant hypertensive lesion is sufficient reason to aggressively treat this group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mailloux et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: