Why the study?
Is right ventricular systolic dysfunction associated with higher plasma BNP levels in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Is right ventricular systolic dysfunction associated with higher plasma BNP levels in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
In patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, a major increase in BNP levels suggests the presence of concomitant right ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May indicate concomitant RV dysfunction when BNP is elevated in HFrEF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
This study sought to investigate whether the presence of right ventricular systolic dysfunction with pre-existing left ventricular systolic dysfunction is associated with higher plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, compared with patients with isolated left ventricular dysfunction. Eighty-five patients referred for evaluation of isotopic ventricular function were prospectively included in the study. Left (LVEF) and right (RVEF) ventricular ejection fractions were evaluated by gated blood pool scintigraphy and compared with plasma BNP levels. BNP correlated negatively with LVEF, except in patients with ischaemic heart disease (P=0.09) and in patients with LVEF<40% (P=0.11). In contrast, BNP levels correlated negatively with RVEF for all subgroups. Among patients with RVEF<40%, no significant BNP difference was found between patients with or without additional left ventricular systolic dysfunction (P=0.51). Among patients with LVEF<40%, plasma BNP levels were significantly higher in patients with RVEF<40% than in patients with RVEF>/=40% (P=0.004) whereas age, renal function, clinical findings, ventricular volumes, LVEF or medication were not significantly different. In conclusion, an important increase in BNP levels in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be considered by cardiologists as an indication of high risk of right ventricular dysfunction and should justify further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mariano‐Goulart et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: