Why the study?
Does primary preventive ICD implantation improve survival in patients awaiting heart transplantation?
Does primary preventive ICD implantation improve survival in patients awaiting heart transplantation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Primary preventive ICD implantation as a short-term bridge to heart transplantation did not demonstrate a clear survival benefit in this small randomized cohort.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether short-term primary preventive cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation as bridge to heart transplantation (HTX) provides any survival benefit. Thirty-three patients awaiting HTX were randomized to either conventional therapy (control group) or primary preventive ICD implantation (ICD group). Fourteen patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and 19 patients had dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Sixteen patients were randomized to the ICD group and 17 patients were randomized to the control group. Twenty patients (61%) were transplanted after a waiting time of 10 ± 9 months. The remaining 13 patients (39%) were not transplanted because of clinical improvement (n = 5), cerebral hemorrhage (n = 3), or death (n = 5). On the waiting list, 3 ICD patients with DCM developed slow VTs without ICD intervention, two patients with ICM (6%) had fast VT terminated by the ICD, and no arrhythmic death was observed. After 11.9 years (median), 13 of 20 HTX patients (65%) and 5 of 13 non-HTX patients (38%) were alive. Survivors had a higher LVEF (22 ± 6 vs. 17 ± 4%, P = 0.0092) and a better exercise capacity (75 ± 29 vs. 57 ± 24 Watt, P = 0.0566) at baseline as compared to nonsurvivors. This study may not support the general use of primary preventive ICDs as a short-term bridge to heart transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pezawas et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: