There is significant global variability in the definition and prevalence of severe hypertriglyceridemia, highlighting the need for standardized nomenclature and thresholds to improve disease burden estimates.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines vary in defining severe hyperglyceridemia (sHTG), affecting estimates of disease burden. This review examined sHTG definitions in clinical guidelines and prevalence and incidence in the general adult population across countries. METHODS: Embase and MEDLINE® were searched on 14 March, 2025 to identify guidelines on sHTG definitions and studies on prevalence/incidence. Prevalence estimates were stratified by triglyceride (TG) threshold to define sHTG type, with studies having substantial bias or methodological issues excluded from analysis. RESULTS: The most commonly used threshold for defining sHTG among 18 identified guidelines was TG > 500 mg/dL. Overall pooled prevalence estimates for unspecified/mixed (primary or secondary/acquired) sHTG defined as TG > 500 mg/dL, TG > 886 mg/dL, and TG > 1000 mg/dL were 1:88 (1.14%), 1:526 (0.19%), and 1:556 (0.18%), respectively. Population-based studies on primary sHTG were limited, with the United States (US) reporting prevalence of 1:125 (0.80%) and Spain 1:667 (0.15%) for sHTG defined as TG > 500 mg/dL. Incidence data were also scarce; for unspecified/mixed sHTG, Canada reported cumulative incidence of 1:400 adults for TG 886 to 1771 mg/dL and 1:2500 for TG > 1771 mg/dL, while Denmark reported incidence of 39 per 100,000 person-years for TG > 886 mg/dL. A US study reported 24 per 100,000 person-years for primary sHTG with TG > 500 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: This review highlights variability in sHTG definitions and prevalence/incidence across regions, with the US and China showing higher prevalence of sHTG than Europe. Standardization of nomenclature, definitions, and TG thresholds is necessary to improve comparability. Longitudinal studies should be conducted to identify patients with persistently elevated TGs to obtain more accurate estimates of sHTG incidence.
Baass et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: