Why the study?
Prior CABG patients undergoing PCI often have multiple comorbidities, and the effects of ticagrelor with or without aspirin after a short course of DAPT had not been examined in this population.
Does ticagrelor monotherapy reduce bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in high-risk patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI?
Does ticagrelor monotherapy reduce bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in high-risk patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI?
In high-risk patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI, dropping aspirin and continuing ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic risk.
May support aspirin withdrawal after 3-month DAPT in this high-risk group; extends TWILIGHT but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are often older and present with multiple comorbidities. Ticagrelor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has emerged as an effective bleeding-avoidance strategy among high-risk patients. AIMS: We aimed to examine the effects of ticagrelor with or without aspirin in prior CABG patients undergoing PCI within the TWILIGHT trial. METHODS: After 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients were randomised to either aspirin or placebo, in addition to ticagrelor, for 12 months and compared by prior CABG status. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. The key secondary endpoint was all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. RESULTS: =0.484). When comparing target vessel type, treatment effects were consistent among graft- and native-vessel interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patients with prior CABG, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced bleeding without compromising ischaemic outcomes compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sardella et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: