Why the study?
Does closed-loop stimulation (CLS) rate-adaptive pacing improve performance and physiological parameters during activities of daily living compared to accelerometer or no rate sensor in elderly pacemaker patients?
Population
74 elderly subjects recently implanted with a Cylos pacemaker who required ≥80% pacing during at least one…
Comparison
Closed-loop stimulation rate-adaptive sensor mode vs Accelerometer rate-adaptive sensor mode and no…
Design
Other
Follow-up
acute testing
Authors
Loading...
CLS merits prospective trials for orthostatic symptoms in pacemaker patients; leaves open routine adoption versus standard modes.
Does closed-loop stimulation (CLS) rate-adaptive pacing improve performance and physiological parameters during activities of daily living compared to accelerometer or no rate sensor in elderly pacemaker patients?
Closed-loop stimulation provides a more physiological rate-adaptive pacing response during daily activities in elderly patients, improving functional performance and reducing orthostatic hypotension compared to accelerometer or no rate sensor.
Abi‐Samra et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: