Key result
LA reservoir strain outperformed LV global longitudinal strain for HFpEF diagnosis (AUC = 0.802), while the LASr/LVGLS ratio provided the best prognostic value (C-index = 0.670).
Why the study?
Abnormal LV mechanics may adversely affect other cardiac chambers as HFpEF progresses, prompting an exploration of atrioventricular and ventricular mechanical interdependence and myocardial mechanics' diagnostic and prognostic value.
Does automated function imaging of myocardial mechanics provide diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with suspected and confirmed HFpEF?
Observational (n=170)
Does automated function imaging of myocardial mechanics provide diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with suspected and confirmed HFpEF?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.802
LA reservoir strain and the LASr/LVGLS ratio assessed by automated function imaging provide significant diagnostic and prognostic value in evaluating interchamber mechanical coupling in HFpEF.
May aid HFpEF evaluation; leaves open whether automated strain imaging improves outcomes in prospective studies.
Abnormal left ventricular (LV) mechanics may adversely affect the mechanical function of other chambers as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) progresses. This study aimed to explore the atrioventricular and ventricular mechanical interdependence and compare the diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial mechanics in HFpEF patients. A total of 170 patients were classified into HFpEF group (n = 90, scores ≥ 5 points) and suspected HFpEF group (n = 80, between 2 and 4 points) according to the HFA-PEFF scoring system. Strain parameters of the left atrium (LA), right atrium (RA), left ventricle (LV), and right ventricle (RV), as well as strain coupling indices, were analyzed using automated function imaging. Compared to the suspected HFpEF group, HFpEF patients showed worse biventricular systolic function and bi-atrial reservoir and conduit function. In HFpEF patients, lower LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) was significantly associated with impaired RV and RA strain (all p < 0.05), but not with LA strain. In suspected HFpEF patients, most results were opposite, except for RV global strain. LA reservoir strain (LASr) showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.802), while the LASr/LVGLS ratio showed the best prognostic value (C-index = 0.670), with reduced ratios predicting adverse outcomes. Impaired LVGLS was independently associated with RV and RA dysfunction in HFpEF, but only associated with LA mechanical impairment in the early stages. LASr outperformed LVGLS for diagnosis, while the LASr/LVGLS ratio provided the best prognostic value, underscoring the relevance of interchamber mechanical coupling in HFpEF evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=170). Confirmed HFpEF (HFA-PEFF score ≥ 5) vs. Suspected HFpEF (HFA-PEFF score 2-4) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of LA reservoir strain (LASr) (AUC 0.802). LA reservoir strain outperformed LV global longitudinal strain for HFpEF diagnosis (AUC = 0.802), while the LASr/LVGLS ratio provided the best prognostic value (C-index = 0.670).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: