Key result
Polygenic risk scores are linked to up to ~29% higher CHD risk per SD.
Why the study?
Most polygenic risk scores for CHD are derived from European ancestry populations, leaving their performance in a Mexican population unclear.
Do polygenic risk scores predict coronary heart disease in a Mexican population?
Cohort (n=133,207)
Do polygenic risk scores predict coronary heart disease in a Mexican population?
Effect estimate: OR 1.05 to 1.29 (95% CI 1.03-1.08 to 1.25-1.33)
Existing polygenic risk scores predict coronary heart disease independently of established vascular risk factors in a Mexican population, though they do not noticeably improve the C-statistic of clinical risk models.
PRS independently associated with CHD in Mexicans; extends evidence but leaves open improvement in risk models.
AIMS: Most polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for coronary heart disease (CHD) are derived from European ancestry populations. This paper evaluates the performance of CHD PRSs in a Mexican population. METHODS AND RESULTS: 133 207 participants aged 35-79 years from the Mexico City Prospective Study were included. Eight PRSs (comprising 44-6 472 620 polymorphisms) were selected for prediction of CHD (defined as self-reported prior heart attack or angina, or CHD death before age 80 years). Logistic regression was adjusted for age, sex, and the first seven genetic principal components, before and after adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve ('C-statistic') was also estimated. Of the included participants, 67% were women, the mean (±SD) age was 51 ± 12 years, and Indigenous American ancestry averaged 67%. CHD was documented for 5163 participants (3.9%), including 1901 prevalent and 3479 fatal cases. All eight PRSs were positively and log-linearly associated with CHD, with odds ratios (ORs) per 1 SD PRS increase ranging from 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.08) to 1.29 (95% CI, 1.25-1.33). Associations were consistent across strata of age and ancestry and were independent of other vascular risk factors. For six PRSs, however, associations were substantially stronger in men than women. Multi-ancestry PRSs outperformed Eurocentric-ancestry PRSs. Despite remaining predictive of risk independently of established non-genetic risk factors, inclusion of a PRS into a risk model did not increase the C-statistic noticeably. CONCLUSION: In this Mexican population, existing PRSs predicted CHD independently of established vascular risk factors, particularly for men. PRSs better capturing genetic variation in Latin American people may further enhance risk prediction in such populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=133,207). Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) vs. Per 1 SD PRS increase was evaluated on Coronary heart disease (self-reported prior heart attack or angina, or CHD death before age 80 years) (OR 1.05 to 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.08 to 1.25-1.33). Polygenic risk scores predicted coronary heart disease independently of established vascular risk factors, with odds ratios per 1 SD increase ranging from 1.05 to 1.29.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: