Why the study?
Does successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion improve 1-month health status compared to unsuccessful recanalization in patients with CTO?
Population
125 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions in the…
Comparison
Successful percutaneous coronary intervention… vs Unsuccessful percutaneous coronary intervention…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
1 month
Authors
Loading...
May inform shared decision-making in symptomatic CTO patients; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Does successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion improve 1-month health status compared to unsuccessful recanalization in patients with CTO?
Successful percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions provides significant early improvements in angina, physical function, and quality of life, particularly in symptomatic patients.
Grantham et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: