Why the study?
Does intracoronary autologous bone-marrow-derived stem cell infusion improve MRI circumferential strain in patients after myocardial infarction?
Does intracoronary autologous bone-marrow-derived stem cell infusion improve MRI circumferential strain in patients after myocardial infarction?
MRI segmental strain analysis is feasible for assessing regional myocardial function following cell therapy, detecting modest interval changes in segmental circumferential strain.
Supports modest regional LV recovery after cell therapy; extends MRI strain as a sensitive endpoint for post-MI trials.
Background. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) strain analysis is a sensitive method to assess myocardial function. Our objective was to define the feasibility of MRI circumferential strain (ε cc) analysis in assessing subtle changes in myocardial function following stem cell therapy. Methods and Results. Patients in the Amorcyte Phase I trial were randomly assigned to treatment with either autologous bone-marrow-derived stem cells infused into the infarct-related artery 5 to 11 days following primary PCI or control. MRI studies were obtained at baseline, 3, and 6 months. ε cc was measured in the short axis views at the base, mid and apical slices of the left ventricle (LV) for each patient (13 treatments and 10 controls). Mid-anterior LV ε cc improved between baseline -18.5 ± 8.6 and 3 months -22.6 ± 7.0, P = 0.03. There were no significant changes in ε cc at 3 months and 6 months compared to baseline for other segments. There was excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement for basal and mid circumferential strain. Conclusion. MRI segmental strain analysis is feasible in assessment of regional myocardial function following cell therapy with excellent intra- and inter-observer variability's. Using this method, a modest interval change in segmental ε cc was detected in treatment group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatti et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: