Why the study?
Does planar electrode electrophysiology provide comparable reliability to traditional electrophysiology for assessing hERG liability of pharmaceutical compounds?
Does planar electrode electrophysiology provide comparable reliability to traditional electrophysiology for assessing hERG liability of pharmaceutical compounds?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Planar electrode electrophysiology offers a reliable, higher-throughput alternative to traditional methods for screening hERG liability in drug discovery.
Unintended inhibition of the cardiac potassium channel human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) is considered the main culprit in drug-induced arrhythmias known as torsades de pointes. Electrophysiology is the most reliable in vitro screening method for identifying potential cardiac hERG liabilities, but only the recent advent of planar electrode-based voltage clamp electrophysiology promises sufficient throughput to support the drug testing needs of most drug discovery programs. We have assessed the reliability of this new format of the voltage clamp technology in measuring the activity of small molecules on the hERG channel. Based on the results herein of a screening against a panel of well-characterized hERG-active and -inactive molecules, we demonstrate that planar electrode electrophysiology, utilizing the Sealchip and PatchXpress technology platform (AVIVA Biosciences Corp., San Diego, CA), is comparable to traditional electrophysiology based on glass micropipettes in its reliability and data content. The new technology will allow significantly higher throughput and more thorough testing of pharmaceutical compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: