Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
July 5, 2021Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering

Leaflet stress quantification of porcine vs bovine surgical bioprostheses: an in vitro study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Increased leaflet mechanical stress is a primary determinant of bioprosthetic aortic valve structural deterioration, but differences between porcine and pericardial bioprostheses remained to be characterized.

Does a bioprosthesis with externally mounted pericardium have higher leaflet mechanical stress compared to an internally mounted porcine valve in an in vitro model?

Population

Mosaic and Trifecta surgical bioprostheses

Comparison

Bioprosthesis with externally mounted pericardium vs internally mounted porcine valve

Design

In vitro and in silico biomechanical study

Authors

VSViktória StanováYGYves Godio‐RaboutetPBPaul Barragan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Hypothesis-generating for reduced pericardial valve durability; leaves open need for clinical validation.

Structured PICO

Does a bioprosthesis with externally mounted pericardium have higher leaflet mechanical stress compared to an internally mounted porcine valve in an in vitro model?

P
Population
In vitro models of bioprosthetic aortic valves
I
Intervention
Bioprosthesis with externally mounted pericardium (Abbott, Trifecta)
C
Comparator
Bioprosthesis with internally mounted porcine valve (Medtronic, Mosaic)
O
Outcome
Timing, magnitude, and regional distribution of leaflet mechanical stresssurrogate

In vitro and in silico modeling demonstrates that externally mounted pericardial bioprostheses experience higher maximum leaflet stress than internally mounted porcine valves, which may translate to shorter durability.

Cite This Study

Stanová et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8233a01b8b6a4492b4acabhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1928092
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share