Key result
Prolonged antibiotics show no benefit over shorter courses for endocarditis after prosthetic valve bacteremia.
Why the study?
This study sought to determine the incidence of endocarditis in hospitalized bacteremic patients with prosthetic heart valves, along with its risk factors and the effect of antibiotic therapy duration.
Does the duration of antibiotic therapy affect the development of endocarditis in bacteremic patients with prosthetic heart valves?
Observational (n=171)
Yes
Does the duration of antibiotic therapy affect the development of endocarditis in bacteremic patients with prosthetic heart valves?
Bacteremic patients with prosthetic heart valves are at high risk for developing endocarditis, and the duration of prior antibiotic therapy does not appear to significantly alter this risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antibiotic duration showed no endocarditis association; should not change practice and leaves optimal therapy open for randomized trials.
Objective To determine the incidence of endocarditis in bacteremic patients with prosthetic heart valves and the risk factors for and the effect of duration of antibiotic therapy on development of endocarditis in such patients. Design Multicenter, prospective observational study. Setting Six university teaching hospitals with high-volume cardiothoracic surgery. Participants One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients with prosthetic heart valves who developed bacteremia during hospitalization. Measurements and main results Patients were evaluated when they were identified as having bacteremia and 1, 2, 6, and 12 months after its occurrence. Of 171 patients, 74 (43%) developed endocarditis: Fifty-six (33%) had prosthetic valve endocarditis at the time bacteremia was discovered ("endocarditis at outset"), whereas 18 (11%) developed endocarditis a mean of 45 days after bacteremia was discovered ("new endocarditis"). Mitral valve location and staphylococcal bacteremia (Staphylococcus aureus or S. epidermidis) were significantly associated with the development of "new" endocarditis. All 18 cases of new endocarditis were nosocomial, and in 6 of these cases (33%) bacteremia was acquired via intravascular devices. Twenty-one patients without evidence of endocarditis at the time of bacteremia received short-term antibiotic therapy (< 14 days); 1 patient (5%) developed endocarditis. Eleven of 70 patients (16%) who received long-term antibiotic therapy (> 14 days) developed endocarditis (P > 0.2). Conclusions Bacteremic patients with prosthetic heart valves were at notable risk for developing endocarditis, even when they received antibiotic therapy before endocarditis developed and regardless of the duration of such therapy. Intravascular devices were a common portal of entry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guodong Fang (1993) conducted an observational in Prosthetic heart valves with nosocomial bacteremia (n=171). Long-term antibiotic therapy (> 14 days) vs. Short-term antibiotic therapy (< 14 days) was evaluated on Development of prosthetic valve endocarditis (p=>0.2). Bacteremia in prosthetic heart valve patients resulted in a 43% endocarditis incidence, with no difference between >14 vs <14 days of antibiotics.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: