Why the study?
Does pulse CO-oximetry accurately detect changes in carboxyhaemoglobin saturation following CO rebreathing to determine blood volume in healthy individuals?
Does pulse CO-oximetry accurately detect changes in carboxyhaemoglobin saturation following CO rebreathing to determine blood volume in healthy individuals?
Pulse CO-oximetry following CO rebreathing provides a noninvasive, accurate, and reproducible method to determine blood volume in healthy individuals.
Supports noninvasive blood volume assessment in healthy volunteers; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
The objective of this study was to determine whether changes in carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) saturation following carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing can be accurately detected by pulse CO-oximetry in order to determine blood volume. Noninvasive measurements of carboxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpCO) were continuously monitored by pulse CO-oximetry before, during and following 2 min of CO rebreathing. Reproducibility and accuracy of noninvasive blood volume measurements were determined in 16 healthy non-smoking individuals (15 males, age: 28 ± 2 years, body mass index: 25.4 ± 0.6 kg m(-2)) through comparison with blood volume measurements calculated from invasive measurements of COHb saturation. The coefficient of variation for noninvasive blood volume measurements performed on separate days was 15.1% which decreases to 9.1% when measurements were performed on the same day. Changes in COHb saturation and SpCO following CO rebreathing were strongly correlated (r = 0.90, p < 0.01), resulting in a significant correlation between invasive and noninvasive blood volume measurements (r = 0.83, p = 0.02). Changes in SpCO following CO rebreathing can be accurately detected by pulse CO-oximetry, which could potentially provide a simplified, convenient and reproducible method to rapidly determine blood volume in healthy individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lalande et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: