Why the study?
The paper aims to summarize current knowledge on the clinical importance of iron deficiency and the therapeutic effects of iron supplementation in patients with HFrEF.
Does intravenous iron therapy improve outcomes in patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency?
Does intravenous iron therapy improve outcomes in patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency?
Intravenous iron therapy is a beneficial and guideline-recommended treatment for improving symptoms and reducing hospital readmissions in symptomatic patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency.
May support IV iron for symptoms and readmissions in HFrEF with iron deficiency; leaves open mortality benefit confirmation.
Anemia is a frequently observed comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) and it contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. Even though the etiology of anemia in HF patients is polymorphic, chronic inflammation and iron deficiency (ID) are reported as the most frequent underlying causes. Anemia is a strong prognostic marker in both acute and chronic HF, while ID, even in the absence of anemia, has a negative impact on patients' symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life (QOL). In chronic HF, functional ID is often present due to impaired iron utilization, but it may coexist with absolute ID, where iron stores are depleted. Intravenous (IV) iron therapy has been shown to have a beneficial effect on improving functional status, reducing symptoms, and lowering the rate of hospital readmissions. This has led to its inclusion in the latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as a recommended treatment for symptomatic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Several studies have also described a consistent trend toward reduced mortality. The aim of this paper is to summarize current knowledge on the importance of ID and the therapeutic effects of iron supplementation in HFrEF patients. Timely recognition and correction of ID should be considered a cornerstone of individualized HfrEF management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otašević et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: