Key result
High-intensity interval training exerts larger improvements in cardiopulmonary functional capacity compared to moderate-continuous exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Does high-intensity interval exercise training improve exercise capacity compared to moderate-continuous exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does high-intensity interval exercise training improve exercise capacity compared to moderate-continuous exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure?
High-intensity interval training yields greater improvements in exercise capacity than moderate-continuous training in stable heart failure patients and should be used to complement existing exercise modalities.
May favor HIIT for exercise capacity gains in chronic heart failure; leaves open confirmation by large RCTs before practice change.
Exercise training (ET) is strongly recommended in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Moderate-intensity aerobic continuous ET is the best established training modality in CHF patients. In the last decade, however, high-intensity interval exercise training (HIIT) has aroused considerable interest in cardiac rehabilitation community. Basically, HIIT consists of repeated bouts of high-intensity exercise alternated with recovery periods. In CHF patients, HIIT exerts larger improvements in exercise capacity compared to moderate-continuous ET. These results are intriguing, mostly considering that better functional capacity translates into an improvement of symptoms and quality of life. Notably, HIIT did not reveal major safety issues; although CHF patients should be clinically stable, have had recent exposure to at least regular moderate-intensity exercise, and appropriate supervision and monitoring during and after the exercise session are mandatory. The impact of HIIT on cardiac dimensions and function and on endothelial function remains uncertain. HIIT should not replace other training modalities in heart failure but should rather complement them. Combining and tailoring different ET modalities according to each patient's baseline clinical characteristics (i.e. exercise capacity, personal needs, preferences and goals) seem the most astute approach to exercise prescription.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giallauria et al. (2016) conducted a review in Chronic heart failure. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Moderate-intensity continuous exercise training was evaluated. High-intensity interval training exerts larger improvements in cardiopulmonary functional capacity compared to moderate-continuous exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: