Key result
A review of international guidelines found consensus on diagnostic testing and severe disease management for preeclampsia, but controversy remains regarding screening and mild hypertension treatment.
Why the study?
Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, largely due to a lack of effective screening and management policies.
This review highlights areas of consensus and controversy across major international guidelines for the screening and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.
Clinicians should follow local guidelines amid preeclampsia screening and mild hypertension controversies; leaves open need for international harmonization.
IMPORTANCE: Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Τhe lack of effective screening and management policies appears to be one of the main reasons. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review and compare recommendations from published guidelines on these common pregnancy complications. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A descriptive review of guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, the International Society of Hypertension, the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy, the European Society of Cardiology, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, the World Health Organization, and the US Preventive Services Task Force on gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was carried out. RESULTS: There is an overall agreement that, in case of suspected preeclampsia or new-onset hypertension, blood and urine tests should be carried out, including dipstick test for proteinuria, whereas placental growth factor-based testing is only recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the European Society of Cardiology. In addition, there is a consensus on the recommendations for the medical treatment of severe and nonsevere hypertension, the management of preeclampsia, the appropriate timing of delivery, the optimal method of anesthesia and the mode of delivery, the administration of antenatal corticosteroids and the use of magnesium sulfate for the treatment of eclamptic seizures, the prevention of eclampsia in cases of severe preeclampsia, and the neuroprotection of preterm neonates. The reviewed guidelines also state that, based on maternal risk factors, pregnant women identified to be at high risk for preeclampsia should receive low-dose aspirin starting ideally in the first trimester until labor or 36 to 37 weeks of gestation, although the recommended dose varies between 75 and 162 mg/d. Moreover, most guidelines recommend calcium supplementation for the prevention of preeclampsia and discourage the use of other agents. However, controversy exists regarding the definition and the optimal screening method for preeclampsia, the need for treating mild hypertension, the blood pressure treatment targets, and the postnatal blood pressure monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The development and implementation of consistent international protocols will allow clinicians to adopt effective universal screening, as well as preventive and management strategies with the intention of improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsakiridis et al. (2021) conducted a review in Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. National and international guidelines was evaluated on Recommendations on screening and management. A review of international guidelines found consensus on diagnostic testing and severe disease management for preeclampsia, but controversy remains regarding screening and mild hypertension treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: