SB 209670 is an effective, enterically bioavailable endothelin receptor antagonist in vivo that selectively inhibits the haemodynamic effects of endothelin-1.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bolsters endothelin antagonism as research target in animals; leaves open clinical translation and therapeutic utility.
The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of SB 209670, a high affinity non-peptide endothelin receptor antagonist (0.4 and 18 nM Kis at human cloned ETA and ETB receptors, respectively), to inhibit the haemodynamic actions of endothelin-1 in vivo. 2. Systemic administration of (+/-)-SB 209670, given either as a bolus i.v. injection or as a continuous i.v. infusion, did not alter basal haemodynamic parameters in the anaesthetized rat. 3. Infusion of (+/-)-SB 209670 (10 micrograms kg-1 min-1) selectively inhibited the depressor and carotid vasodilator response to exogenous endothelin-1: 100 micrograms kg-1 min-1 was required to inhibit significantly the biphasic haemodynamic actions of endothelin-1. The haemodynamic actions of angiotensin II and calcitonin gene-related peptide were unaltered by 100 micrograms kg-1 min-1 (+/-)-SB 209670. 4. Bolus i.v. administration of (+/-)-SB 209670 (1 mg kg-1) selectively inhibited the depressor and carotid vasodilator actions of endothelin-1: 10 mg kg-1 (+/-)-SB 209670 was required to inhibit the secondary vasoconstrictor actions of endothelin-1. 5. (+/-)-SB 209670 (10 mg kg-1) was also effective at antagonizing the pressor actions of endothelin-1 in the conscious rat for up to 3 h after intraduodenal administration thereby demonstrating that the antagonist was bioavailable upon enteric administration. This dose of (+/-)-SB 209670 did not alter basal haemodynamic parameters in the conscious rat. 6. Thus, ( +/- )-SB 209670 is an effective endothelin receptor antagonist in vivo. Using the doses defined in this study, SB 209670 may, therefore, serve as a useful tool for understanding the role of endogenous endothelin-I in the control of cardiovascular function under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: