Why the study?
Does a single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis prevent postoperative infectious complications as effectively as a triple dose regimen in patients undergoing acute or elective colorectal surgery?
Does a single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis prevent postoperative infectious complications as effectively as a triple dose regimen in patients undergoing acute or elective colorectal surgery?
A single dose of prophylactic antibiotics is as effective as a triple dose regimen in colorectal surgery, while blood transfusion emerges as a strong risk factor for postoperative infectious complications.
Single-dose prophylaxis suffices in colorectal surgery; confirms equivalence to triple dosing while flagging transfusion as major infection risk.
In a randomized prospective controlled trial involving 311 patients undergoing acute or elective colorectal surgery, the efficacy and safety of two different single dose and one triple dose regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis, as well as the influence of blood transfusion on postoperative infectious complications, were studied. Postoperative infectious complications occurred in a total of 59 patients (19.0 per cent). There were no major differences between the three treatment groups. Thirty-four patients (10.9 per cent) developed abdominal wound infection, 17 patients (5.5 per cent) intra-abdominal abscess and 16 patients (5.1 per cent) anastomotic leakage. Of 202 patients (65.0 per cent) requiring blood transfusion during hospitalization 57 (28.2 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 23-36 per cent) developed infectious complications, whereas two non-transfused patients (1.8 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 0.2 to 6 per cent; P less than 0.001) developed infectious complications. It is concluded that one single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute and elective colorectal surgery is as protective as a triple dose regimen. The development of infectious complications despite antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly related to blood transfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: