Why the study?
Recent evidence suggested women with HFrEF might require lower doses of RAS inhibitors and β-blockers than men, prompting an evaluation of current treatment patterns and the hypothetical impact of sex-specific dosing in women.
Does a hypothetical sex-specific target dose (50% of standard dose) increase the proportion of women with HFrEF achieving appropriate dosing?
Does a hypothetical sex-specific target dose (50% of standard dose) increase the proportion of women with HFrEF achieving appropriate dosing?
Implementing a hypothetical sex-specific target dose for HFrEF medications in women would increase the proportion considered adequately treated and highlights that many women may be relatively overdosed by current standards.
Current ESC dosing may classify many women as undertreated; leaves open whether sex-specific targets improve outcomes.
AIMS: A recent study suggested that women with heart failure and heart failure reduced ejection fraction might hypothetically need lower doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers ( = renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors) and β-blockers than men to achieve the best outcome. We assessed the current medical treatment of heart failure reduced ejection fraction in men and women in a large contemporary cohort and address the hypothetical impact of changing treatment levels in women. METHODS: This analysis is part of a large contemporary quality of heart failure care project which includes 5320 (64%) men and 3003 (36%) women with heart failure reduced ejection fraction. Detailed information on heart failure therapy prescription and dosage were collected. RESULTS: Women less often received renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (79% vs 83%, p < 0.01), but more often β-blockers (82% vs 79%, p < 0.01) than men. Differences in guideline-recommended target doses between sexes were relatively small. Implementing a hypothetical sex-specific dosing schedule (at 50% of the current recommended dose in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines in women only) would lead to significantly higher levels of women receiving appropriate dosing (β-blocker 87% vs 54%, p < 0.01; renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor 96% vs 75%, p < 0.01). Most interestingly, the total number of women with >100% of the new hypothetical target dose would be 24% for β-blockers and 52% for renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors, which can be considered as relatively overdosed. CONCLUSION: In this large contemporary heart failure registry, there were significant but relatively small differences in drug dose between men and women with heart failure reduced ejection fraction. Implementation of the hypothetical sex-specific target dosing schedule would lead to considerably more women adequately treated. In contrast, we identified a group of women who might have been relatively overdosed with increased risk of side-effects and intolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veenis et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: