The rapid in vivo formation of the 140-kDa IGFBP-3 complex indicates a much greater availability of circulating IGFs than previously estimated.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diabetic rats show impaired IGFBP-3 complex formation; hypothesis-generating for altered IGF bioavailability in human diabetes.
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) forms a 140-kilodalton (kDa) complex with an acid-labile glycoprotein after complexing with IGF-I or IGF-II. To investigate the bioavailability of circulating IGFs in the rat, we determined the molecular distribution and disappearance of an iv bolus of human IGFBP-3 (130 micrograms/kg). Serum fractions were assayed after size-separation chromatography for human (h) and rat (r) IGFBP-3 with specific RIAs. Within 2 min of injection, 52.9 +/- 1.6% of the hIGFBP-3 appeared in a 140-kDa complex. This form remained in the circulation for hours, whereas hIGFBP-3 in 50- and 30-kDa forms disappeared within 30-60 min. The rapid complexing of hIGFBP-3 to the 140-kDa form did not occur in vitro. Measurement of endogenous rIGFBP-2 indicated that there was minimal exchange of hIGFBP-3 with rIGFBP-3 in the 140-kDa complex within the 60 min of the in vivo study. To determine the importance of IGF-I in regulating the molecular distribution of hIGFBP-3 in serum, the experiment was repeated in streptozotocin-diabetic rats, with total IGF-I levels 50% lower than control values. In these animals, 40.1 +/- 5.2% of the hIGFBP-3 appeared in the 140-kDa complex 2 min after injection, significantly less than that in controls (P < 0.05), and hIGFBP-3 disappeared more quickly from the circulation than in controls (P < 0.05). After coinjection of recombinant human IGF-I, the retention of hIGFBP-3 in the circulation was prolonged in both control and diabetic animals. Because IGFBP-3 must bind IGF before it can associate with the acid-labile subunit, these findings indicate a much greater availability of IGFs to the circulation than previously estimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewitt et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: