Key result
Perirenal fat thickness measured with CT-scan showed a strong positive correlation with perirenal fat volume (r = 0.86 to 0.91, p <0.001), serving as a reliable estimate of perirenal fat mass.
Why the study?
Does perirenal fat thickness measured by CT-scan reliably estimate perirenal fat volume in overweight and obese subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
Blinded endpoint evaluation
No
Does perirenal fat thickness measured by CT-scan reliably estimate perirenal fat volume in overweight and obese subjects?
Effect estimate: r = 0.86 to 0.91
p-value: p=<0.001
Perirenal fat thickness measured by CT-scan is a simple and reliable estimate of perirenal fat volume in overweight and obese subjects.
Deposition of perirenal adipose tissue has been associated with adverse renal and cardiovascular events. We compared various methods to measure perirenal adipose tissue using computerized tomography (CT)-scan and performed correlations with anthropometric measures associated with renal and cardiovascular events. Voluntary overweight and obese subjects undergoing a CT-scan for diagnostic purposes were included in the study. Perirenal adipose tissue volume, adipose tissue area of the renal sinus and perirenal fat thickness were manually measured bilaterally. The intra- and inter-observer coefficient correlations and the correlation between the diverse measures of renal adipose tissue, subcutaneous (SC-)fat and anthropometrics measures were analyzed using Pearson's correlation tests. The forty included patients (24 men, 16 women) had a mean age of 57.6 ± 18.1 years and a mean body mass index of 28.9 ± 2.9 kg/m2. Despite comparable waist circumference, women had a greater SC-fat thickness compared to men, and therefore a smaller amount of visceral fat, as well as smaller perirenal fat volumes. Perirenal fat thickness was better correlated with perirenal fat volume than adipose area of the renal sinus (p <0.02). The adipose area of the renal sinus did not correlate with any anthropometric measures. In women, perirenal fat volume and thickness showed a negative correlation with SC-fat thickness and no correlation with waist circumference. In men, perirenal fat volume and thickness showed a positive correlation with waist circumference and no correlation with subcutaneous fat thickness. In conclusion, perirenal fat thickness measured with CT-scan at the level of the renal veins is a simple and reliable estimate of perirenal fat volume, that correlated negatively with SC-fat in women and positively with waist circumference in men. The adipose area of the renal sinus did not correlate with any anthropometric measure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Favrè et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Overweight and obesity (n=40). Perirenal fat thickness measured with CT-scan was evaluated on Correlation between perirenal fat thickness and perirenal fat volume (r = 0.86 to 0.91, p=<0.001). Perirenal fat thickness measured with CT-scan showed a strong positive correlation with perirenal fat volume (r = 0.86 to 0.91, p <0.001), serving as a reliable estimate of perirenal fat mass.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: