Key result
Soluble GPVI concentrations distinguished patients with ACS from those with stable angina pectoris with an area under the ROC curve of 0.716.
Why the study?
Does a novel sandwich immunoassay for soluble glycoprotein VI (sGPVI) accurately distinguish acute coronary syndrome from stable angina pectoris in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=2,438)
Does a novel sandwich immunoassay for soluble glycoprotein VI (sGPVI) accurately distinguish acute coronary syndrome from stable angina pectoris in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel sandwich immunoassay for sGPVI can reliably measure sGPVI and may help identify patients with ACS earlier than other laboratory markers.
BACKGROUND: Platelet glycoprotein VI (pGPVI) expression is increased in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), reflecting platelet activation. There is no reliable method available to measure pGPVI. Our aim was to develop a bead-based sandwich immunoassay to measure soluble GPVI (sGPVI). METHODS: Based on antibodies for sGPVI developed earlier, we established and validated a bead-based sandwich immunoassay in 2438 consecutive patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP; n = 1371), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; n = 724), and ST-elevation MI (STEMI; n = 343). In a subgroup (n = 1011), we measured surface expression of pGPVI using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The assay revealed a working range of 8-500 ng/L. Intra- and interassay imprecision was <7% and <14%, respectively. Patients with NSTEMI and STEMI showed significantly lower mean sGPVI concentrations than patients with SAP [mean (SD), 8.4 (3.6) μg/L and 8.6 (4.1) μg/L vs 9.8 (4.8) μg/L; P = 0.002], whereas subgroup analysis revealed significantly enhanced pGPVI in NSTEMI (n = 276) and STEMI (n = 80) patients compared with SAP (n = 655) [mean fluorescence intensity (SD), 21.2 (8.1) and 19.8 (6.8) vs 18.5 (7.7); P = 0.002 and P = 0.018]. pGPVI and sGPVI were inversely correlated (r = -0.076; P = 0.023). Area under the ROC curve was 0.716, 95% CI 0.681-0.751, for sGPVI, distinguishing patients with SAP from those with ACS, and was superior (P = 0.044) to the curve of subgroup analysis for pGPVI (0.624, 95% CI 0.586-0.662). sGPVI (P = 0.023) and pGPVI (P = 0.028) had better association with the development of ACS than troponin I (P = 0.055) in the very early stage of disease, based on logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This sandwich immunoassay reliably measures sGPVI and may help to identify patients with ACS earlier than other laboratory markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bigalke et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease (n=2,438). Soluble Glycoprotein VI (sGPVI) concentration vs. Stable angina pectoris (SAP) reference group was evaluated on Distinguishing patients with SAP from those with ACS (AUC 0.716, 95% CI 0.681-0.751, p=0.044). Soluble GPVI concentrations distinguished patients with ACS from those with stable angina pectoris with an area under the ROC curve of 0.716.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: