Key result
Cluster set resistance training did not alter heart rate variability parameters, whereas traditional resistance training significantly reduced parasympathetic and increased sympathetic activity (p<0.05).
Why the study?
This study investigates the effects of cluster set resistance training on heart rate variability parameters in young, healthy individuals.
Does cluster set resistance training reduce autonomic perturbations compared to traditional protocols in trained healthy young individuals?
RCT (n=16)
Does cluster set resistance training reduce autonomic perturbations compared to traditional protocols in trained healthy young individuals?
p-value: p=< 0.05
Cluster set resistance training minimizes cardiac autonomic stress and perceived exertion compared to traditional sets in healthy young individuals.
Cluster-set RT may blunt acute HRV suppression versus traditional sets in young adults; hypothesis-generating, needs larger trials before practice implications.
Objectives: This study investigates the effects of cluster set resistance training (RT) on heart rate variability (HRV) parameters in young, healthy individuals. Methods: This trial was registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) under the identification number RBR-9857xj3 on 7 December 2024. Sixteen participants (seven female, 25 ± 2 years old) performed both cluster set and traditional RT protocols with equal relative intensity (85% 10RM), volume load (4 × 10 repetitions), and rest intervals (120 s). Cluster set configuration involved the introduction of a shorter rest interval between a cluster of sets [4 × (2 × 5) with 90 s inter-set rest and 30 s intra-set rest]. HRV parameters (RMSSD, HFnu, SD1, LFnu, LF/HF ratio, and SD2) were assessed before and 30 min post-exercise. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was assessed immediately after RT protocols. Results: The traditional RT protocol led to a significant reduction in parasympathetic activity (RMSSD, HFnu, SD1) and an increase in sympathetic activity (LFnu, LF/HF ratio, and SD2) (p < 0.05), whereas the cluster set RT protocol did not alter HRV parameters. Additionally, RPE was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the traditional RT protocol. Conclusion: This study suggests that the cluster set may have a less pronounced impact on HRV parameters 30 min post-exercise compared to traditional sets. These findings can guide exercise physiologists in designing resistance training programs for clinical populations by prescribing protocols that minimize cardiac autonomic stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alves et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=16). Cluster set resistance training vs. Traditional resistance training was evaluated on Heart rate variability (HRV) parameters and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (p=< 0.05). Cluster set resistance training did not alter heart rate variability parameters, whereas traditional resistance training significantly reduced parasympathetic and increased sympathetic activity (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: