Key result
Aliskiren/atenolol combination therapy reduced systolic blood pressure significantly more (17.3 mmHg) than aliskiren (14.3 mmHg, P=0.039) or atenolol (14.3 mmHg, P=0.034) alone.
Why the study?
Does aliskiren alone or in combination with atenolol improve blood pressure reduction compared to atenolol alone in patients with hypertension?
RCT (n=694)
double-blind
randomised
Yes
Does aliskiren alone or in combination with atenolol improve blood pressure reduction compared to atenolol alone in patients with hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.3% vs 14.3%
p-value: p=0.034
Aliskiren provides effective blood pressure reduction with favorable tolerability compared to atenolol, and their combination yields superior systolic blood pressure reduction.
Supports aliskiren/atenolol combination for enhanced BP control in hypertension; extends monotherapy comparisons to dual renin-angiotensin/beta-blockade.
INTRODUCTION: Aliskiren is the first in a new class of direct renin inhibitors to be approved for the treatment of hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, multicentre trial, 694 patients with hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [BP] > or = 95 and < 110 mmHg) were randomised to once-daily aliskiren 150 mg (n=231), atenolol 50 mg (n=231) or the combination (150/50 mg; n=232) for six weeks, followed by a further six weeks on double the initial doses of aliskiren and atenolol. Efficacy (reduction from baseline in mean sitting systolic and diastolic BP) and tolerability of study treatments were assessed; plasma renin activity (PRA) was measured in a subset of patients. RESULTS: At Week 12 endpoint, aliskiren, atenolol and aliskiren/atenolol lowered systolic and diastolic BP from baseline by 14.3/11.3, 14.3/13.7 and 17.3/14.1 mmHg, respectively. Systolic BP reductions with aliskiren/atenolol were significantly greater than those with aliskiren (p=0.039) or atenolol (p=0.034) alone, and diastolic BP reductions were greater than with aliskiren alone (p<0.001). Diastolic BP changes were larger with atenolol than with aliskiren (p=0.003, correlating with the large reductions in pulse rate (> 10 bpm) observed with atenolol. Aliskiren, atenolol and aliskiren/atenolol reduced geometric mean PRA from baseline by 65%, 52% and 61%, respectively. In patients with moderate or high baseline PRA (> or = 0.65 ng/ml/hour), PRA was reduced to low levels (< 0.65 ng/ml/hour) at Week 12 endpoint in a greater proportion of patients receiving aliskiren (11/15 patients, 73.3%) or aliskiren/atenolol (18/23, 78.3%) than with atenolol (10/21, 47.6%). Aliskiren treatment was associated with numerically lower rates of adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events compared with atenolol or combination treatment, and unlike atenolol was not associated with bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Direct renin inhibition with aliskiren may be an appropriate substitute for beta-blocker treatment in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. Aliskiren also represents an attractive option for dual therapy with atenolol to improve systolic BP/pulse pressure reductions and BP control with maintained tolerability compared with atenolol alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dietz et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in hypertension (n=694). Aliskiren and atenolol combination vs. Aliskiren alone or atenolol alone was evaluated on reduction from baseline in mean sitting systolic and diastolic BP (p=0.034). Aliskiren/atenolol combination therapy reduced systolic blood pressure significantly more (17.3 mmHg) than aliskiren (14.3 mmHg, P=0.039) or atenolol (14.3 mmHg, P=0.034) alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: