Why the study?
Does peroperative electrical calf muscle stimulation prevent postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as effectively as dextran 40 in surgical patients?
Does peroperative electrical calf muscle stimulation prevent postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as effectively as dextran 40 in surgical patients?
Peroperative electrical calf muscle stimulation is as effective as dextran 40 for the prophylaxis of postoperative thromboembolism, offering potential advantages in safety and simplicity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrical stimulation may match dextran 40 for thromboembolism prophylaxis; hypothesis-generating for antithrombin III–guided risk assessment.
The effects of peroperative electrical calf muscle stimulation with groups of impulses giving a short lasting tetanus of the calf muscles on postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were compared with that of dextran 40 given per and postoperatively. The incidence of DVT and PE during the first 4-6 postoperative days was recorded. The diagnosis of DVT was based on the 125I-fibrinogen uptake test and phlebography and of PE on pre- and postoperative perfusion pulmonary scintigram and chest X-ray examination. Both methods reduced the incidence of PE. Calf muscle stimulation reduced the DVT incidence in patients with malignant disease while the reduction in DVT incidence for the whole group only was significant in the stimulation as well as the dextran 40 group. Mean values for preoperatively determined levels of antithrombin III, beta-thromboglobulin, fibrinopeptide A, plasminogen and ability to release fibrinolytic activity during venous stasis did not differ between those patients who developed or those who did not develop postoperative DVT or PE. However, antithrombin III levels below 80 per cent appeared to predispose to postoperative thromboembolism. The two prophylactic methods have similar effects on the incidence of postoperative thromboembolism. The stimulation method has certain advantages due to its safety and simplicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindström et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: