Why the study?
This study aimed to explore the rapid effects of dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Does dapagliflozin improve functional, echocardiographic, electrophysiological, and biochemical parameters in type 2 diabetic patients with HFrEF?
Does dapagliflozin improve functional, echocardiographic, electrophysiological, and biochemical parameters in type 2 diabetic patients with HFrEF?
Two weeks of dapagliflozin in diabetic HFrEF patients reduced blood pressure and ventricular ectopy but did not improve cardiac filling pressure or functional status, while unexpectedly increasing high-sensitivity troponin T.
Short-term dapagliflozin lowers BP and ectopy without improving function in diabetic HFrEF; challenges expectations for rapid benefits and leaves longer-term effects open.
AIMS: This study aimed to explore the rapid effects of dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the functional, echocardiographic, electrophysiological, lung ultrasound, ambulatory blood pressure (BP), microvascular and macrovascular function, and biochemical effects of 2 week treatment with dapagliflozin in 19 type 2 diabetic HFrEF patients in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial. Dapagliflozin had no significant effect on clinical, functional, or quality of life parameters. Dapagliflozin reduced systolic BP [114 (105, 131) vs. 106 (98, 113) mmHg, P < 0.01] and diastolic BP [71 (61, 78) vs. 62 (55, 70) mmHg, P < 0.01]. There was no effect on cardiac chamber size, ventricular systolic function, lung ultrasound, or arterial wave reflection. Dapagliflozin increased creatinine [117 (92, 129) vs. 122 (107, 135) μmol/L, P < 0.05] and haemoglobin [135 (118, 138) vs. 136 (123, 144) g/L, P < 0.05]. There was a reduction in ventricular ectopy [1.4 (0.1, 2.9) vs. 0.2 (0.1, 1.4) %, P < 0.05] and an increase in standard deviation of normal heart beat intervals [70 (58, 90) vs. 74 (62, 103), P < 0.05]. Unexpectedly, dapagliflozin increased high-sensitivity troponin T [25 (19, 37) vs. 28 (20, 42) ng/L, P < 0.01] and reduced reactive hyperaemia index [1.29 (1.21, 1.56) vs. 1.40 (1.23, 1.84), P < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 weeks, while multiple parameters supported BP reduction and haemoconcentration with dapagliflozin, reduction in cardiac filling pressure, lung water, and functional improvement was not shown. Reduced ventricular ectopic burden suggests an early antiarrhythmic benefit. The small increase in troponin T and the reduction in the reactive hyperaemia index warrant further mechanistic exploration in this treatment of proven mortality benefit in HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilyas et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: