Key result
Elevated SIRI linked to ~11-fold higher AF odds, improving detection when combined with ApoB/ApoA1.
Why the study?
This study aimed to investigate whether the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) mediates the relationship between the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio and AF, and to assess their combined discriminative ability for identifying AF.
Cross-Sectional (n=638)
No
The combination of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio provides superior discriminative ability for identifying the presence of atrial fibrillation compared to either biomarker alone.
Supports hypothesis of inflammatory mediation in AF; leaves open whether these markers improve prediction or alter management.
Objective This study aimed to investigate whether the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) acts as a mediator between the apolipoprotein B/A1 ratio and atrial fibrillation, and assess the combined discriminative ability of the two indicators for identifying AF. Method In this retrospective single-center analysis, a final cohort of 638 individuals was enrolled for analysis. Among them, persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) was diagnosed in 212 cases and paroxysmal AF (PAF) in 212. The reference group comprised 214 age-matched inpatients without AF. To investigate the associations among SIRI, the ApoB/ApoA1, and AF risk, we used a multivariable analysis. Additionally, fully adjusted logistic regression models with restricted cubic spline (RCS) terms were employed to explore potential nonlinear relationships between SIRI, the ApoB/ApoA1, and AF presence. Spearman analysis was used to assess their monotonic relationship. Mediation analysis was conducted with ApoB/ApoA1 as the exposure and SIRI as the mediator, with AF as the outcome. ROC analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative accuracy of ApoB/ApoA1, SIRI, and their combination for AF detection. DeLong's test was used to compare the AUCs. Sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score were calculated across multiple cutoff points, with the Youden index identifying the optimal threshold. Finally, we performed a subgroup analysis stratified by the use of lipid-lowering drugs to evaluate the potential effect modification by lipid-lowering therapy. Result The mediation analysis indicated that SIRI served as a partial statistical mediator of the inverse ApoB/ApoA1–AF relationship. The ROC analysis showed AUCs of 0.728 for ApoB/ApoA1, 0.760 for SIRI and 0.799 for the combined model. When contrasted with ApoB/ApoA1 alone, the ApoB/ApoA1 + SIRI combination achieved a significantly higher AUC (DeLong test, P < 0.001). Compared with SIRI alone, the integrated model also yielded a notably larger AUC (DeLong test, P = 0.002). The ApoB/ApoA1 + SIRI model exhibited the highest AUC, along with improved specificity, the lowest Brier score, and positive discriminative value. Besides, these findings are not affected by lipid-lowering drug use. However, given the cross-sectional design, these finding reflects statistical interdependence rather than a causal sequence. Conclusion Elevated SIRI and reduced ApoB/ApoA1 were significantly associated with higher odds of AF. The statistical mediation effect of SIRI suggests a potential interrelationship among these variables. The combined model outperformed all others in discriminative performance, offering a practical exploratory tool for patient stratification. However, these findings require independent external validation and prospective confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=638). Elevated Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI >1.27) vs. Low SIRI (<0.72) was evaluated on Presence of atrial fibrillation (OR 10.91, 95% CI 5.63-21.17, p=<0.001). Elevated systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI >1.27) was associated with significantly higher odds of atrial fibrillation (OR 10.91) compared to lower levels, and a combined model of SIRI and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio achieved an AUC of 0.799 for AF detection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: