Key result
A nondipping nocturnal heart rate profile (found in 12% of patients) was not associated with subclinical organ damage compared to a dipping profile (78%) in untreated essential hypertension.
Why the study?
Is a blunted decrease in day-night heart rate associated with subclinical organ damage in untreated essential hypertensive patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=658)
Is a blunted decrease in day-night heart rate associated with subclinical organ damage in untreated essential hypertensive patients?
A blunted nocturnal heart rate decrease is not associated with prevalent subclinical organ damage in untreated essential hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nondipping nocturnal heart rate does not flag subclinical damage in untreated hypertension; leaves open its prognostic value in prospective cohorts.
AIM: The association between a blunted decrease in day–night heart rate and subclinical organ damage has not been investigated earlier in human hypertension. Therefore, we assessed such an association in a cohort of 658 untreated essential hypertensive patients. METHODS: All patients underwent procedures including cardiac and carotid ultrasonography, 24-h urine collection for microalbuminuria, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with simultaneous assessment of heart rate over two 24-h periods within 4 weeks. Nondipping heart rate was defined as a mean heart rate reduction at night lower than 10% compared with daytime values. RESULTS: A reproducible nocturnal dipping (heart rate decrease >10% in both the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring periods) and nondipping profile was found in 513 (78%) and 76 patients (12%), respectively; 69 hypertensive patients (10%) had a variable dipping profile. The three groups did not differ with regard to age, sex, body size, metabolic variables, office and ambulatory blood pressures, left ventricular mass, carotid intima-media thickness, carotid plaque and microalbuminuria. In a univariate analysis, the decrease in nocturnal heart rate did not correlate with any parameter of subclinical organ damage. CONCLUSION: Our findings from a cross-sectional study do not support the view that a flattened heart rate circadian rhythm is related to a prevalent organ damage in essential hypertension and that this altered pattern is a marker for subclinical cardiovascular disease. The prognostic significance of this finding should be defined by prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuspidi et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Essential hypertension (n=658). Nondipping nocturnal heart rate profile vs. Nocturnal dipping heart rate profile was evaluated on Subclinical organ damage (left ventricular mass, carotid intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, and microalbuminuria). A nondipping nocturnal heart rate profile (found in 12% of patients) was not associated with subclinical organ damage compared to a dipping profile (78%) in untreated essential hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: