Why the study?
Does nutritional intervention in place of antihypertensive drugs affect cardiac status compared to continued drug therapy in less severely hypertensive patients?
Does nutritional intervention in place of antihypertensive drugs affect cardiac status compared to continued drug therapy in less severely hypertensive patients?
Nutritional therapy replacing antihypertensive drugs maintained similar cardiac status at four years compared to continued drug therapy, despite slightly higher average blood pressures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nutritional intervention may substitute for drugs in milder hypertension without cardiac harm; extends evidence for nonpharmacologic strategies.
A randomized controlled trial demonstrated the ability of nutritional intervention in place of antihypertensive drugs to maintain blood pressure at normal levels for four years in 39% of less severely hypertensive patients whose blood pressure was previously well controlled by pharmacologic treatment. However, average blood pressures during the trial for patients in the intervention group were higher than those for a comparison group that continued to receive drug therapy throughout the study. Holter monitoring, echocardiography, roentgenography, and electrocardiography done at four years to determine whether blood pressure differences between groups were associated with differences in cardiac status did not indicate any differences in cardiac status favorable to one group compared with the other. Further investigation in larger samples is needed to assess any long-term differences in cardiac status based on such alternate therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rose Stamler (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: