Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 1976Journal of General Virology

Comparison of Swine Vesicular Disease Virus and Coxsackie B5 Virus by Serological and RNA Hybridization Methods

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Swine vesicular disease virus and Coxsackie B5 virus isolates

Design

Preclinical

Authors

FBF. BrownJohn Innes CentreTWThorsten WildNokia (Finland)LRL.W. RoweHarare Central Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

SVDV's closer relation to prototype Coxsackie B5 informs historical emergence; leaves open modern zoonotic or surveillance implications.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) and Coxsackie B5 virus isolates (including prototype Faulkner strain and recent isolates)
I
Intervention
Virus neutralization, immunodiffusion tests, and RNA hybridization
O
Outcome
Relatedness and differences between the viruses

The study demonstrates that swine vesicular disease virus is more closely related to the prototype Faulkner strain of Coxsackie B5 virus than to recent Coxsackie B5 isolates, providing insight into its emergence.

Cite This Study

Brown et al. (1976) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a865533e7c8470ab14ca562https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-31-2-231
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Polioviruses, Coxsackieviruses, and Echoviruses: Comparison of the Genomes by RNA Hybridization1973 · 50 citations
  2. 2Polynucleotide Sequence Homologies among the RNAs of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Types A, C and O1971 · 23 citations
  3. 3Purification and Electron Microscopy of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus1958 · 37 citations
  4. 4Attempts to infect pigs with Coxsackie virus type B51974 · 18 citations