This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• EIC shows highest thermal stability and flash point (261.3°C), ensuring superior safety. • SIC forms a protective SiO 2 layer during combustion but emits heavy smoke. • MIC exhibits high flammability and rapid mass loss, posing significant fire risk. • Comprehensive safety evaluation ranks EIC as the optimal coolant for high-safety energy storage systems. With the increasing demand for high battery energy density and thermal management, immersion liquid cooling has emerged as a promising strategy, while the safety of coolants remains an area requiring further investigation. The study systematically compares the physicochemical properties, thermal stability, combustion behavior, and char residuals of mineral oil-based coolant (MIC), silicone oil-based coolant (SIC), and ester-based coolant (EIC). The results indicated that MIC exhibited a low flash point (199.2°C), poor thermal stability, and underwent dramatic combustion after ignition. Although SIC formed a protective SiO 2 layer during combustion that inhibited further combustion, it released tremendous smoke particles. In contrast, EIC demonstrated the highest initial decomposition temperature and flash point (261.3°C), combining low flammability with excellent thermal stability. A comprehensive safety evaluation revealed that EIC offered the best overall safety. This study provides valuable insights for coolant selection in safety-critical energy storage systems.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: