Key result
Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation was an independent predictor of severe stroke compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (OR 4.27; 95% CI 1.91-10.2; P=0.0003).
Why the study?
Does persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation worsen stroke severity and infarct volume in patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism or TIA?
Observational (n=161)
No
Does persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation worsen stroke severity and infarct volume in patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism or TIA?
Odds Ratio: 4.27 (95% CI 1.91–10.2)
p-value: p=0.0003
Cardiogenic emboli due to non-valvular persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation are associated with a worse acute clinical course and greater volume of infarction than those due to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
May heighten vigilance for severe stroke in persistent AF; leaves open need for prospective validation of mechanisms and management.
Aims: Some studies have shown that the type of atrial fibrillation (AF), whether paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent or permanent AF (PeAF), affects the incidence of ischaemic stroke. This study sought to determine the relationship between the AF pattern and the severity and brain volume of infarction in an AF population including transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients. Methods and results: This was a retrospective observational study. We studied 161 consecutive patients who were admitted to our stroke care unit with cardiogenic embolism or TIA related to non-valvular AF (age 79 ± 9.5, 78 females, and 87 PAF patients). We evaluated the differences in severity and infarct volume between the types of AF. Additionally, we divided the patients into three groups according to severe stroke (n = 38), TIA (n = 28), and those who were neither (stroke, n = 95) for the assessment of the predictors of severe stroke and TIA. Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation patients with acute cardiogenic stroke or TIA had worse peak National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores [PAF median 4 (range 3-14), PeAF 17 (5.8-25); P < 0.0001] and worse NIHSS scores at discharge [PAF 2.0 (1-7), PeAF 11 (3-22); P < 0.0001]. Their infarct brain volume assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was also larger [PAF 4.4 (1.1-32) mL, PeAF 64 (6.9-170) mL; P < 0.0001]. Multivariate analysis of severe stroke vs. non-severe stroke patients showed that having PeAF was the only independent predictor of severe stroke [odds ratio (OR) 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-10.2; P = 0.0003]. Comparison of TIA vs. non-TIA patients showed that PeAF (OR 0.120, 95% CI 0.0230-0.444; P = 0.0008) and anticoagulant use (OR 8.24, 95% CI 2.15-40.8; P = 0.0018) were independent predictors of TIA. Conclusion: Cardiogenic emboli due to non-valvular PeAF are associated with a worse acute clinical course and greater volume of infarction than those due to PAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inaba et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Cardiogenic embolism or TIA related to non-valvular AF (n=161). Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was evaluated on Severe stroke (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.91-10.2, p=0.0003). Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation was an independent predictor of severe stroke compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (OR 4.27; 95% CI 1.91-10.2; P=0.0003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: