Key result
Home treatment of acute pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe, with over 98% of patients treated at home experiencing an uncomplicated course.
Why the study?
Does home treatment provide a safe and feasible alternative to hospitalization in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Population
Patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Comparison
Home treatment (outpatient setting) vs Hospitalization
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Supports home treatment in selected acute PE; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
Does home treatment provide a safe and feasible alternative to hospitalization in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Home treatment of acute pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe for a significant proportion of patients, potentially improving quality of life and reducing healthcare costs.
Wall et al. (2018) conducted a review in Acute pulmonary embolism. Home treatment vs. Hospitalization was evaluated on Uncomplicated course. Home treatment of acute pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe, with over 98% of patients treated at home experiencing an uncomplicated course.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: