Pimobendan and its active metabolite UD-CG 212 Cl induce vasodilation via distinct mechanisms of Ca2+-dependent K+ channel activation.
The aim of this study was to clarify the mechanisms of activation of Ca2+-dependent K+ (K(Ca)) channels by pimobendan, a new cardiotonic and vasodilator agent with phosphodiesterase inhibition properties, and its main metabolite, UD-CG 212 Cl, in vascular smooth-muscle cells from porcine coronary arteries. Both pimobendan and UD-CG 212 Cl induced relaxation of porcine coronary artery strips. However, in the presence of 100 microM Rp-cAMPS (Rp diastereomer of adenosine cyclic 3',5'-phosphorothioate), a membrane-permeable antagonist of cAMP, the effects of pimobendan decreased significantly. Application of 1 microM pimobendan activated K(Ca) channels in cell-attached patches, and this increase in activity was suppressed by 100 nM H-89 (N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinoline-sulfonamide), a cAMP-dependent protein-kinase inhibitor. Pimobendan was ineffective in altering the activity of K(Ca) channels in inside-out patches. In contrast, UD-CG 212 Cl, at a concentration of 1 microM, activated K(Ca) channels not only in cell-attached patches but also in inside-out patches. Application of 100 nM H-89 also inhibited UD-CG 212 Cl-induced K(Ca) channels activity but to a lesser degree than that induced by pimobendan in cell-attached patches. In conclusion, there are two mechanisms of activation of K(Ca) channels by pimobendan and UD-CG 212 Cl. Activation by pimobendan occurs primary through the cAMP pathway, whereas UD-CG 212 Cl activates K(Ca) channels directly as well as through the cyclic AMP pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: