Why the study?
DHAV-1 and DAstV-3 coinfection is common and causes similar clinical characteristics in ducklings, making diagnosis difficult and necessitating a rapid, simultaneous detection method.
The established duplex SYBR Green I-based qPCR assay provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for simultaneous detection of DHAV-1 and DAstV-3.
New duplex qPCR enables simultaneous DHAV-1/DAstV-3 detection in ducks; leaves open routine diagnostic adoption pending validation.
Duck viral hepatitis (DVH) mainly affects ducklings under 1 month of age, causes liver necrosis, enlargement, and hemorrhage, and is highly lethal, seriously jeopardizing the duck industry. The prevalence of duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV-1) and duck astrovirus type 3 (DAstV-3) is increasing, and coinfection is common. Moreover, the similar clinical characteristics of the DHAV-1 and DAstV-3 infections and the high frequency of coinfection make diagnosis difficult. In this study, to establish a method for the rapid, simultaneous detection of DHAV-1 and DAstV-3, two pairs of specific primers were designed according to their conserved gene regions. An SYBR® Green I-based qPCR assay was successfully established that can quickly and differentially detect the two viruses. Moreover, the assay is highly specific and does not show cross-reaction with other common viruses. The detection limit of the method is 7.34 × 101 copies/µl and 3.78 × 101 copies/µl for DHAV-1 and DAstV-3, respectively, indicating high sensitivity. A total of 34 clinical samples were tested using the established method; the positive rates for DHAV-1 and DAstV-3 were 14.71% and 8.82%, respectively, and that for coinfection was 2.94% (1/34), which was better than that obtained with conventional PCR. In summary, the SYBR Green I-based qPCR assay established in this study has high specificity, good sensitivity and accuracy, high feasibility, and is rapid. Thus, it can be a powerful tool for the coinfection detection of DHAV-1 and DAstV-3 and for future epidemiologic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: