Key result
A newly developed real-time quantitative PCR assay for DHAV-C demonstrated high specificity and a minimum detection limit of 3.36 x 10^3 copies per reaction, making it 10 times more sensitive than conventional RT-PCR.
Absolute Event Rate: 3360% vs 33600%
A novel real-time PCR assay targeting the 2C gene provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for detecting DHAV-C in ducklings.
May aid DHAV-C detection in ducklings; leaves open field performance and clinical utility pending validation.
Recently, duck hepatitis A virus genotype C (DHAV-C), a causative agent of duck viral hepatitis, has been responsible for increasing economic losses in the duck industry in China and South Korea. In this study, a real-time PCR assay targeting the 2C gene for detecting DHAV-C was developed. The assay was confirmed to be specific and sensitive, and the minimum detection limit was 3.36 × 10(3) copies per reaction, making this assay suitable for rapid diagnosis of DHAV-C infection from clinical samples. In addition, the dynamics of the viral loads in tissues of specific-pathogen-free (SPF) ducklings infected with DHAV-C were investigated using this method. The DHAV-C could be detected earliest in the liver within 12 h postinfection. Moreover, high viral loads were identified in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, bursa of Fabricius, thymus, pancreas, brain, and small intestine after 24 h postinfection. Taking the data collectively, the study described in this report is the first to have developed a real-time PCR method for detection of DHAV-C and thus contributes to pathogenicity research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2012) studied Duck Hepatitis A Virus Genotype C (DHAV-C) infection (n=88). Real-time quantitative PCR assay targeting the 2C gene vs. Conventional RT-PCR was evaluated on Minimum detection limit (copies per reaction). A newly developed real-time quantitative PCR assay for DHAV-C demonstrated high specificity and a minimum detection limit of 3.36 x 10^3 copies per reaction, making it 10 times more sensitive than conventional RT-PCR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: