Why the study?
Does remote ischemic preconditioning reduce perioperative myonecrosis and myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery?
Does remote ischemic preconditioning reduce perioperative myonecrosis and myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery?
The CRIPES study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning for reducing perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote ischemic preconditioning remains unproven for perioperative myocardial protection in vascular surgery; CRIPES leaves open its safety and efficacy.
Background: Vascular surgery is considered a high-risk operation with an anticipated perioperative risk of serious cardiac ischemic complications in excess of 10%. One potential strategy for reduction of myocardial ischemia during the perioperative period is Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC). Design: The Cardiac Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Elective Vascular Surgery (CRIPES, NCT: 01558596) is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled phase 2 trial using RIPC prior to elective vascular surgery. CRIPES plans to enroll and treat 180 patients over 4 years and gather safety and efficacy data for one-month after surgery. Preliminary estimates for two potential measures of efficacy will be examined: 1) a two-part test of postsurgical increases in cardiac troponin I as a measure of myonecrosis and 2) the proportion of patients in each treatment arm meeting the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Discussion: Knowledge gained from the CRIPES study will help inform further testing of RIPC prior to non-cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santiago García (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: