Key result
Catheter ablation renal denervation significantly reduced 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 11.7 mm Hg compared to a 3.5 mm Hg reduction in the control group at 6 months in patients with mild resistant hypertension.
Why the study?
Does catheter ablation renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with mild resistant hypertension?
Meta-Analysis (n=145)
Yes
Does catheter ablation renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with mild resistant hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: -11.7% vs -3.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Catheter-based renal denervation significantly reduces ambulatory and office blood pressure and decreases the antihypertensive medication burden in patients with mild resistant hypertension at 6 months.
Refinement: Positions renal denervation as an effective adjunct to reduce medication burden in mild resistant hypertension.
Renal denervation (RDN) has been proposed as a novel interventional antihypertensive technique. However, existing evidence was mainly from patients with severe resistant hypertension. The authors aimed to evaluate the efficacy of RDN in patients with resistant hypertension with mildly elevated blood pressure (BP). Studies of RDN in patients with mild resistant hypertension (systolic office BP 140-160 mm Hg despite treatment with three antihypertensive drugs including one diuretic, or mean systolic BP by 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement [ABPM] 135-150 mm Hg) were included. Two observational and one randomized cohort were identified (109 patients in the RDN group and 36 patients in the control group). Overall, the mean age of patients was 62±10 years, and 69.7% were male. Before-after comparison showed that RDN significantly reduced ABPM as compared with the baseline systolic ABPM, from 146.3±13 mm Hg at baseline to 134.6±14.7 mm Hg at 6-month follow-up and diastolic ABPM from 80.8±9.4 mm Hg at baseline to 75.5±9.8 mm Hg at 6-month follow up (both P<.001). This significant effect was not observed in the control group. Between-group comparison showed a greater change in ABPM in the RDN group as compared with that in the control group (change in systolic ABPM: -11.7±9.9 mm Hg in RDN vs -3.5±9.6 mm Hg in controls [P<.001]; change in diastolic ABPM: -5.3±6.3 mm Hg in RDN vs -2.1±5.5 mm Hg in control [P=.007]). RDN was also associated with a significantly decreased office systolic/diastolic BP and reduced number of antihypertensive medications. No severe adverse events were found during follow-up. RDN seems feasible to treat patients with mild resistant hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Mild resistant hypertension (n=145). Catheter ablation renal denervation vs. Control (sham or no intervention) was evaluated on Change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (ΔABPM SBP) (p=<0.001). Catheter ablation renal denervation significantly reduced 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 11.7 mm Hg compared to a 3.5 mm Hg reduction in the control group at 6 months in patients with mild resistant hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: