Key result
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography reliably assessed left atrial appendage size (r=0.77) and peak flow velocities (r=0.67) compared to transoesophageal echocardiography (both P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) reliably assess left atrial appendage size and blood flow velocity compared to transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in unselected patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=86)
Yes
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) reliably assess left atrial appendage size and blood flow velocity compared to transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in unselected patients?
Transthoracic echocardiography can reliably assess left atrial appendage size and blood flow velocities, correlating well with transesophageal echocardiography to help define individual embolic risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TTE may aid LAA assessment when TEE is infeasible; leaves open its utility for embolic risk stratification pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) in the assessment of left atrial appendage (LAA) size and function. METHODS: We considered 86 consecutive patients [56 male, 30 female; mean age 64 +/- 13 years, sinus rhythm 36 patients (42%); atrial flutter/fibrillation 50 patients (58%)] referred for transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and TTE. Maximum LAA transverse diameters and LAA peak flow velocities were calculated by two-dimensional and pulsed-wave Doppler analysis at TEE and TTE. RESULTS: LAA systolic transverse diameters were detectable in 78 patients (91%) by TTE and showed a significant correlation with TEE (r = 0.77, P < 0.0001). LAA peak flow velocities were measurable by TTE in 72 patients (84%) and were comparable with TEE (50.4 +/- 23 vs 47.3 +/- 23.2 cm/s, r = 0.67, P < 0.0001). A peak blood flow velocity of <25 cm/s at TTE was the best indicator of very low (<20 cm/s) LAA flow velocity as detected by TEE (sensitivity 93%, specificity 87%, area under the curve 0.94, P < 0.0001). Conversely, a peak blood flow velocity of >56 cm/s at TTE indicated a very high (> 40 cm/s) LAA flow velocity as detected by TEE (sensitivity 50%, specificity 96%, area under the curve 0.87; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Reliable LAA size and blood flow velocities can be obtained by TTE in consecutive, unselected patients. TTE identifies patients with low and high blood flow velocities in the LAA, providing helpful information for the definition of individual embolic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coletta et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients referred for echocardiography (n=86). Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Correlation of LAA systolic transverse diameters between TTE and TEE (r = 0.77, p=< 0.0001). Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography reliably assessed left atrial appendage size (r=0.77) and peak flow velocities (r=0.67) compared to transoesophageal echocardiography (both P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: