Why the study?
Does biphasic waveform defibrillation increase ventricular pacing thresholds in recipients of a biphasic implanted cardioverter defibrillator?
Does biphasic waveform defibrillation increase ventricular pacing thresholds in recipients of a biphasic implanted cardioverter defibrillator?
Biphasic waveform defibrillation does not cause clinically important changes in ventricular pacing thresholds, ensuring adequate safety margins with conventional pacemaker outputs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biphasic defibrillation was not associated with increased pacing thresholds; supports device safety margins but leaves open prospective confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Significant increases in ventricular pacing threshold have been observed following monophasic waveform ventricular defibrillation shocks. High-output pacing is recommended to ensure consistent capture, particularly in pacemaker-dependent patients who are likely to be defibrillated. Whether biphasic waveform defibrillation compounds this problem is not known. The purpose of this prospective study was to examine serial changes in ventricular pacing thresholds following single, multiple, low- and high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks from an implanted defibrillator. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bipolar pacing thresholds before and after defibrillation, and the adequacy of pacing capture at three times preshock threshold in the immediate aftermath of ventricular defibrillation, were prospectively evaluated in 67 consecutively tested recipients of a biphasic implanted cardioverter defibrillator. Overall, serial pacing thresholds following successful defibrillation were completely unchanged after 141 of 177 (80%) ventricular fibrillation inductions. In no case did the threshold pulse width increment > 0.06 msec from its baseline value after shock, nor did pacing at a pulse width of three times preshock threshold from dedicated bipolar pacing electrodes fail to result in successful ventricular capture. Changes in threshold were not related to when measured from the time of shock, defibrillation energy, number of shocks, electrode system, chronicity of leads, shock orientation, or to clinical factors. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically important changes in pacing threshold were observed after biphasic waveform defibrillation. Bradycardia pacing at conventional pacemaker outputs of three times baseline pulse width threshold from bipolar electrodes dedicated exclusively to pacing or sensing (but not defibrillation) consistently allowed for an adequate safety margin following defibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kudenchuk et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: