Sustained pacemaker inhibition during automatic PVARP extension in a DDD pacemaker with marked first-degree AV block is a specific device response that should not be misinterpreted as malfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apparent inhibition in DDD pacing with extended PVARP represents expected behavior, not malfunction; single case leaves open device-class prevalence.
S. Serge Barold (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: