Why the study?
Does ICD for primary prevention result in similar rates of appropriate intervention compared to secondary prevention in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Population
54 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Group A treated for primary prevention. Group B treated…
Comparison
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator for… vs Implantable cardioverter defibrillator for…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 21+/-14 months (Group A) and 33+/-23 months (Group B)
Authors
Loading...
May support primary prevention ICD consideration in high-risk idiopathic DCM; leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit.
Does ICD for primary prevention result in similar rates of appropriate intervention compared to secondary prevention in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy at high clinical risk of sudden death receive appropriate ICD interventions at rates similar to those treated for secondary prevention.
Massimo Zecchin (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: