Sequence dissimilarities between human and mouse inward rectifier K+ channels result in significant functional differences in single-channel conductance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Species differences in Kir conductance caution against rodent-to-human extrapolation; leaves open their impact on human cardiac electrophysiology.
We have cloned the human homologue of the inward rectifier K+ channel from both heart and brain tissue (HHBIRK1). The human clones were identical to each other in their coding regions and were highly homologous to the mouse macrophage (IRK1) channel. The inward rectifier currents from human and mouse clones were characterized using a novel strategy for stable ion channel expression in a human cell line. The permeability of the expressed inwardly rectifying channels was greater for K+ than for Rb+, whereas no current was observed when K+ was replaced by Na+. A prominent time- and voltage-dependent block was observed in the presence of Ba2+, whereas a small decay in the steady-state current was observed with millimolar concentrations of Na+. Single-channel conductances of 49.1 +/- 3.3 pS (n = 6) and 40.2 +/- 2.5 pS (n = 3) (P = 0.005) were obtained for the HHBIRK1 and IRK1 clones, respectively. These results indicate that sequence dissimilarities between human and mouse inward rectifier K+ channels may have significant functional consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashen et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: