Why the study?
Current blood pressure measurement methods require additional or dedicated hardware or close device contact, creating a need for a convenient, contactless solution.
A novel smartphone-based contactless blood pressure measurement application demonstrated standard deviation errors of 4.27 mmHg (diastolic) and 6.36 mmHg (systolic).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable convenient contactless BP monitoring; leaves open prospective validation against reference standards before clinical use.
Blood pressure (BP) is a critical physiological parameter closely associated with severe diseases such as heart failure and kidney damage. Current methods either require additional or dedicated hardware, or closing touching to the devices, causing discomfort and inconvenience. Therefore, a convenient, contactless BP measurement solution is highly desired. In this work, we present Ubicon-BP, a ubiquitous, device-free, and contactless BP detection application. Ubicon-BP calculates BP based on the pulse transit time (PTT), a key feature that is medically proven correlated with BP. However, using smartphone sensors to contactless calculate PTT is non-trivial since it requires a micro-second level precision for cardiac event detection. To address this issue, we propose leveraging the acoustic sensors in smartphone to detect vibrations caused by heart valve movements, as well as camera sensors to measure finger pulses. To accurately measure heartbeat signal that are susceptible to motion, we first improve the sensing granularity of acoustic signals and then introduce the IQ-MVED model to eliminate motion interference. Furthermore, when recovering pulse signals from video signals, issues such as poor generalization performance arise. Consequently, we propose the TS-CAN and meta-learning models to obtain personalized pulse signals. Finally, we transform the extracted time-frequency features from the recovered heartbeats and pulse signals to the corresponding BP. Comprehensive testing involving 50 subjects reveal a standard deviation error of4.27 \; mmHgfor diastolic pressure and6.36 \; mmHgfor systolic pressure, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: