Why the study?
What is the normal relationship between QT interval and heart rate during ramp exercise tests in healthy individuals?
What is the normal relationship between QT interval and heart rate during ramp exercise tests in healthy individuals?
The relationship between QT interval and heart rate during ramp exercise is linear, and Bazett's formula should not be used for QTc correction in this setting.
May favor linear QT-HR correction during exercise over Bazett's; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The relation between QT interval and heart rate during ramp exercise tests on a bicycle was investigated in 37 healthy individuals (21 women) without regular medication and with a normal thallium-201 exercise scintigram (mean age 52.9 +/- 8.3, range 38-68). The test started at 20 W and the load increased by 10 W min-1. A 12-lead ECG was recorded twice every min and mean complexes (during a 15 s period) were calculated by computer. At rest the QT interval (in s) corrected for heart rate (QTc) for women and men was 0.408 +/- 0.004 and 0.399 +/- 0.005, respectively, P > 0.05). During exercise there was no difference in QT interval between women and men or between younger (< 50 years) and older (> 50 years) individuals. A straight line was used to describe the relation between QT interval and heart rate (beats min-1; QT = 0.459-12.3 x 10(-4)*HR). A 95% prediction interval around the regression line was determined using a non-parametric statistical method. When QTc was calculated using Bazett's formula with a cut-off value of QTc = 0.46, 19 individuals (11 women) had a prolonged QT interval during exercise. It is concluded that the relation between QT interval and heart rate can during exercise be described by a straight line for normal individuals. It is not valid to use Bazett's formula for correction of QT intervals during ramp exercise tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wohlfart et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: